• 166.879 movies
  • 10.787 shows
  • 31.045 seasons
  • 624.786 actors
  • 9.130.078 votes
Avatar
 
banner banner

Vertigo (1958)

Thriller | 128 minutes
3,90 2.056 votes

Genre: Thriller / Mystery

Duration: 128 minuten

Alternative title: De Vrouw Die Tweemaal Leefde

Country: United States

Directed by: Alfred Hitchcock

Stars: James Stewart, Kim Novak and Barbara Bel Geddes

IMDb score: 8,3 (435.845)

Releasedate: 28 May 1958

Vertigo plot

"Alfred Hitchcock engulfs you in a whirlpool of terror and tension!"

Scottie Ferguson (James Stewart) is a former San Francisco police officer who has retired due to his fear of heights. An old friend asks him to follow his wife because of her suicidal tendencies. After successfully rescuing her from a jump into the water, he slowly becomes obsessed with this beautiful but confused woman.

logo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimage
Full Cast & Crew

Actors and actresses

Det. John 'Scottie' Ferguson

Madeleine Elster / Judy Barton

Marjorie 'Midge' Wood

Gavin Elster

Scottie's Doctor

Manager of McKittrick Hotel

Car Owner Mistaken for Madeleine

Diner at Ernie's (uncredited)

All Media

Trailer & other videos

Reviews & comments


Guest

  • messages
  • votes

Let op: In verband met copyright is het op MovieMeter.nl niet toegestaan om de inhoud van externe websites over te nemen, ook niet met bronvermelding. Je mag natuurlijk wel een link naar een externe pagina plaatsen, samen met je eigen beschrijving of eventueel de eerste alinea van de tekst. Je krijgt deze waarschuwing omdat het er op lijkt dat je een lange tekst hebt geplakt in je bericht.

* denotes required fields.

Pay attention! You cannot change your username afterwards.

* denotes required fields.
avatar van Fisico

Fisico (moderator films)

  • 9355 messages
  • 5109 votes

My third James Stewart movie in a Hitchcock movie after Rear window and The man who knew too much. I also liked this Vertigo, although I don't have the wow-feeling of "the best Hitchcock" that this film bears. However, you get a feeling of unease when you see the intro. Somewhere in the middle of the film there are also experiments with colors and turning circles. Nice! Vertigo has become a psychological film about a detective who suffers from a fear of heights as a result of an accident. Throughout the film you wonder what this is for, but luckily you could do something with it at the end. Was this subplot absolutely necessary to produce the same movie, maybe not. Still, that rooftop chase scene is blood-curdling.

The story is largely about Madeleine, the wife of an acquaintance. She is a bizarre suicidal woman who struggles with the past of one of her ancestors. The great thing about the story and plot is that history repeats itself and Ferguson also finds himself obsessed with a "dark-haired Madeleine". From then on, the film really gets interesting. However, I found the ending a bit bizarre. The nun for example?

Technically, the film is clever and cleverly put together, but that should not come as a surprise to Hitchcock. It seems obvious, but this film will be 60 years old next year. It remains good to see that this and many other of his films continue to look good.

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original

avatar van Shadowed

Shadowed

  • 9747 messages
  • 5891 votes

Thin.

Sometimes the older classics still want to catch me. Knowing that Hitchcock could go ahead with some cool tricks at the time, it is mainly other elements that just don't make it complete here unfortunately.

Because when Hitchcock comes out in style, it looks good. The film is already alive when the Vertigo scenes begin. Those are the parts that make the film special. Also something like that opening are nice additions to the film.

The film is never very exciting and rarely manages to be intense. The moments of tension are scarce and the mystery not too catchy. I didn't really like the twist either. Doubles aren't exactly innovative in the film world anymore.

Acting is way below par. Novak was too bad for words. Stewart too old. The romance soon doesn't really feel that way. Moreover, I think the romance really belongs to the worst romance in the entire history of cinema. So exaggerated, so fake. The dialogues are of a sad level.

I'm shocked that it came from Hitchcock, who I always saw as a somewhat more modern director at the time. Certainly the colors show that Hitchcock was a peculiar man and wanted to dare to do something. But on other genres, especially romance and drama, it really fails miserably.

The scene transitions are old-fashioned, which goes without saying. But I still find it sloppy and abrupt transitions. It all feels quite rushed. The rest of the film has its charms. I'm going to repeat it again, the colorful images. The thriller is intriguing at times and the Vertigo very catchy.

I'm sure it'll be monumental in movie history, but the romance is so annoying that I can't help but enjoy the history.

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original

avatar van mrklm

mrklm

  • 9124 messages
  • 8650 votes

Robert Burks' camera work is superb, Bernard Herrmann provided the musical score that is as beautiful as it is effective and James Stewart impressively portrays the complex protagonist in this romantic mystery. Despite this, this is Hitchcock's weakest film from the 50s and that is mainly due to an extremely far-fetched story that is also full of plot holes and a single coincidence.

The scenes with Barbara Bel Geddes, in a very thankless role, add nothing and without Herrmann's atmospheric music the first half of the film - especially the sequence in which John Madeleine [Kim Novak] shadows endlessly - [/ spoiler] barely get through. Fans of this movie often refer to a few moments (the scene at San Francisco Bay, the famous clock tower zoom shot, and the moment Judy's transformation into Madeleine is completed), but those moments still make not a monumental masterpiece. An overanalyzed and overrated film.

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original