• 183.514 movies
  • 12.689 shows
  • 35.070 seasons
  • 658.610 actors
  • 9.497.775 votes
Avatar
Profile
 
banner banner

Iris (1987)

Thriller | 90 minutes
2,74 110 votes

Genre: Thriller

Duration: 90 minuten

Country: Netherlands

Directed by: Mady Saks

Stars: Monique van de Ven, John Kraaijkamp Sr. and Titus Tiel Groenestege

IMDb score: 6,4 (236)

Releasedate: 26 March 1987

US
UK

This movie is not available on US streaming services.

JustWatch

Iris plot

A female veterinarian (Monique van de Ven) has to overcome many prejudices before she is accepted by a rural community. In particular, the relationship she enters into with the son of an influential gentleman farmer is not appreciated; not by the narrow-minded farming community, but also not by her ex-boyfriend from the city.

Reviews & comments


avatar

Guest

  • messages
  • votes

Let op: In verband met copyright is het op MovieMeter.nl niet toegestaan om de inhoud van externe websites over te nemen, ook niet met bronvermelding. Je mag natuurlijk wel een link naar een externe pagina plaatsen, samen met je eigen beschrijving of eventueel de eerste alinea van de tekst. Je krijgt deze waarschuwing omdat het er op lijkt dat je een lange tekst hebt geplakt in je bericht.

* denotes required fields.

Pay attention! You cannot change your username afterwards.

* denotes required fields.
avatar van Robi

Robi

  • 2606 messages
  • 2567 votes

A film about a female veterinarian (Monique v/d Ven) who settles in the countryside and has to try to carve out a place for herself there. And so we quickly get to know the most important inhabitants of the village, and she also has a pushy boyfriend who wants her back in the city. The film builds up reasonably well, but otherwise the story is only moderately developed. For example, it happens quite often that characters appear in the film who initially seem to have an important role, but who hardly appear later in the film and therefore turn out not to be that important after all. That makes the film messy and also somewhat implausible. It all comes across as a bit rushed. And even Monique van de Ven wasn't always entirely convincing, although there were some pretty beautiful scenes in it. No, this film should have been better. I give it 2.5, but it could have been even lower if I think about it longer.

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original

avatar van blurp194

blurp194

  • 5941 messages
  • 4449 votes

Monique van de Ven plays a free-spirited woman convincing for the 80s, but by today's standards, it all feels a bit outdated. Even in the deepest countryside, I hope the idea of a female veterinarian no longer causes such childish spasms—why must a woman in every conceivable 'male profession' first undergo a sort of baptism of fire, walk the gauntlet, before anyone listens to her? Cringeworthy adolescent behavior. You wish that kind of person would get hit by a spinning testicle, and that only female doctors were available.

But anyway, apparently that alone was enough at the time to consider the film to have sufficient story and substance. The veterinary scenes are indeed quite convincing, and so is Van de Ven. Let that be enough.

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original

Related keywords

veterinarianwoman director