• 178.170 movies
  • 12.220 shows
  • 33.993 seasons
  • 647.240 actors
  • 9.374.148 votes
Avatar
Profile
 
banner banner

Blue Moon (2025)

Biography | 100 minutes
2,95 48 votes

Genre: Biography / Music

Duration: 100 minuten

Country: United States

Directed by: Richard Linklater

Stars: Ethan Hawke, Margaret Qualley and Andrew Scott

IMDb score: 6,9 (11.872)

Releasedate: 18 February 2025

US
UK
JustWatch

Blue Moon plot

Lorenz Hart is part of the songwriting duo Rodgers and Hart. March 31, 1943 marks the premiere of Oklahoma! This Broadway production is the first project in which Richard Rodgers works with Oscar Hammerstein II, who replaces Hart. Throughout his life, Hart struggles with depression and alcoholism. Rodgers and him have many confrontations.

logo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimage
Full Cast & Crew

Actors and actresses

Lorenz Hart

Elizabeth Weiland

Richard Rodgers

Oscar Hammerstein II

Reviews & comments


avatar

Guest

  • messages
  • votes

Let op: In verband met copyright is het op MovieMeter.nl niet toegestaan om de inhoud van externe websites over te nemen, ook niet met bronvermelding. Je mag natuurlijk wel een link naar een externe pagina plaatsen, samen met je eigen beschrijving of eventueel de eerste alinea van de tekst. Je krijgt deze waarschuwing omdat het er op lijkt dat je een lange tekst hebt geplakt in je bericht.

* denotes required fields.

Pay attention! You cannot change your username afterwards.

* denotes required fields.
avatar van mrklm

mrklm

  • 11397 messages
  • 9906 votes

Lyricist Lorenz Hart was 48 years old when he died of pneumonia. He collaborated with Richard Rogers and Oscar Hammerstein and left behind a catalog of over 500 songs, including the evergreen "Blue Moon." This character study unfolds during an evening at Eddie's [Bobby Cannavale] café, where Lorenz [Ethan Hawke] awaits the arrival of 20-year-old Elizabeth [Margaret Qualley], with whom he has a complex love affair. Many acquaintances appear, and the conversations offer a glimpse into Hart, his professional and personal relationships, and his own perspective on his creations. It's atmospheric and well-acted, but the static setting and the copious amount of dialogue make it difficult for Linklater to maintain visual interest.

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original

avatar van mjk87

mjk87 (moderator films)

  • 14518 messages
  • 4515 votes

Halfway through the film, half the theater was empty. I believe this is a record so far (at least with such a full theater. I was once in a theater with a couple, and they left halfway through. I won't be able to reach that 66.66% audience departure rate again anytime soon).

Anyway, objectively it's a pretty good film. I always say that biopics shouldn't focus on an entire life, but rather on a theme (that's what The Aviator ultimately did well, although that film is one of the exceptions where filming an entire life does work) or a limited time period. Lincoln was good, Steve Jobs was good. And this Blue Moon takes place over a period of about an hour and a half, while still allowing you to get to know the person the film revolves around. That's simply good writing.

Two caveats, however. First, the character doesn't really interest me. But that's not insurmountable. However, the film never captivated me for a single moment. Not as a film, and not as a story. Hawke is quite convincing and manages to stay in character, even though his role can veer towards theatrical, but he stays just on the right side of that fine line. That's well done. But he just keeps talking and talking, and it never really captivated me. The film became incredibly tiring and boring.

This is partly due to the fact that there's little to enjoy visually. The atmosphere in that pub, with its constant soft piano music and the subtle lighting, is quite well-captured, but the camerawork and compositions are all far too basic. 1.5 stars.

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original

avatar van filmfan0511

filmfan0511

  • 1094 messages
  • 1124 votes

A unique talkie from Linklater (obviously, how could it be otherwise), in which Ethan Hawke essentially carries the whole thing for 100 minutes with one long, drawn-out monologue. And he does it with gusto. You really don't see Hawke at all; he completely disappears into the character. So the Oscar nomination isn't undeserved, though it is a bit surprising. Because ultimately, it's a very niche film for a very niche audience. Beautifully made and filmed, with an atmospheric location, beautiful, warm lighting, and it all feels very authentically 1940s. Apparently filmed in fifteen days, impressive. The supporting roles are all brilliantly cast—Bobby Cannavale, Andrew Scott, Margaret Qualley—they're all in their element.

But eventually, I started to get a bit tired of it, which isn't a good sign for a film that's not too long. "Hart" keeps rattling on—okay, that's the point, but still—which eventually gets a bit nerve-wracking. Almost too well acted by Ethan Hawke.

Clearly a passion project of his and Linklater, and therefore simply beautiful to have seen.

3*

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original