Insurgent (2015)
Genre: Action / Scifi
Duration: 119 minuten
Alternative titles: The Divergent Series: Insurgent / Divergent: Insurgent
Country:
United States
Directed by: Robert Schwentke
Stars: Shailene Woodley, Theo James and Ansel Elgort
IMDb score:
6,2 (271.967)
Releasedate: 18 March 2015
Insurgent plot
"Defy reality."
Beatrice must search for answers and allies in the ruins of futuristic Chicago. Together with Four, they are now refugees, hunted by Jeanine, the leader of the power-hungry Erudite group. In a race against time, they must find out what Beatrice's family has sacrificed themselves for and why Erudite's leaders are doing everything they can to stop them.
Social Media
Actors and actresses
Beatrice 'Tris' Prior
Tobias 'Four' Eaton
Peter Hayes
Jeanine Matthews
Caleb Prior
Christina
Eric Coulter
Marcus Eaton
Evelyn Johnson-Eaton
Johanna Reyes
Reviews & comments
Onderhond
-
- 87679 messages
- 13027 votes
Part 2.
The first part was already very mediocre, but those first parts of this kind of franchise often benefit from the setup of the setting. What you don't know is still potentially good and the first film also had some potential in that area.
That's something this second film couldn't count on. Can't say I could remember a whole lot from the first part, but luckily I don't have to. Movies like this are pretty obvious, who is the good buy and who is the bad guy is rarely a mystery and there is rarely much nuance. The sci-fi concepts also offer very little to sink your teeth into.
The film doesn't have to rely on good acting either. Shailene Woodley is a dramatic actress, the rest isn't much better really. Fortunately there is still some action in it and the effects are interesting enough in themselves. Far from enough to make a successful film, not least because it lasts two hours, but it could have been worse.
1.5*
Translated from Dutch · View original
martijn011
-
- 2034 messages
- 1309 votes
So far, this series is fine. Had the first part already increased by half after revision, I saw this film for the first time but I quite enjoyed it.
I read a lot that the film is compared to the 'Hunger Games' films, but I like this series significantly better. Although I found Woodley less convincing than in the first part, the rest of the cast was fortunately largely the same so that the film could pick up right where the first part left off.
I could take the story a little less seriously, there are a lot of coincidences and improbabilities here. Strangely enough, it once again captivated me, although I must say that visually it is also fine.
I am curious about the third part, for this second part I also award three stars.
Translated from Dutch · View original
MisterD 1985
-
- 153 messages
- 1002 votes
Nothing special in my eyes. I only watched the movie out of curiosity. The story is thin and not very telling. After a reasonable first part, a major setback.
Translated from Dutch · View original
Latest News
How Serious Film Fans Are Watching in 2026 — And Why the Home Setup Has Never Mattered More
How Much Money Has the Portrayal of Casinos Brought Into the Movie Industry?
The Death of the CGI Safety Net: Why We’re Craving Real Stakes Again
How Media Business Insights Shape Online Casino Marketing Strategies in 2026
Corporate & Media
Realtimes Network
Innovatieweg 20C
7007 CD, Doetinchem, Netherlands
+31(315)-764002
