• 177.873 movies
  • 12.196 shows
  • 33.962 seasons
  • 646.802 actors
  • 9.369.485 votes
Avatar
Profile
 
banner banner

Meteor (1979)

Scifi | 107 minutes
2,07 122 votes

Genre: Scifi

Duration: 107 minuten

Country: United States

Directed by: Ronald Neame

Stars: Sean Connery, Natalie Wood and Karl Malden

IMDb score: 5,1 (9.228)

Releasedate: 19 October 1979

Meteor plot

"There's No Place On Earth To Hide!"

After a collision with a comet, an eight kilometer large asteroid flies straight towards Earth. Because impact could mean the end of humanity, NASA wants to deploy the illegal weapons satellite Hercules, but lack of firepower makes that impossible. Since the Russian government owns the same satellite, cooperation with them is the only possible solution.

logo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimagelogo tmdbimage
Full Cast & Crew

Actors and actresses

Paul Bradley

Tatiana Donskaya

Harry Sherwood

General Adlon

Sir Michael Hughes

Secretary of Defense

The President

General Easton

Rolf Manheim

All Media

Trailer & other videos

Reviews & comments


avatar

Guest

  • messages
  • votes

Let op: In verband met copyright is het op MovieMeter.nl niet toegestaan om de inhoud van externe websites over te nemen, ook niet met bronvermelding. Je mag natuurlijk wel een link naar een externe pagina plaatsen, samen met je eigen beschrijving of eventueel de eerste alinea van de tekst. Je krijgt deze waarschuwing omdat het er op lijkt dat je een lange tekst hebt geplakt in je bericht.

* denotes required fields.

Pay attention! You cannot change your username afterwards.

* denotes required fields.
avatar van Theunissen

Theunissen

  • 12266 messages
  • 5513 votes

Another disaster movie from the 1970s and this time it's about a meteorite that threatens the earth. As a small child I found this film fascinating and exciting at the time and if you watch it now for the first time, you will probably find it laughably bad.

Personally, I think it's not too bad (still after I just revised it) and I liked the story about the cooperation between the Americans and Russians (a very sensitive subject at the time) with their illegal nuclear weapons satellites "Hercules" and "Peter the Great" (equipped with red warheads) to fight the meteor. Of course, these weapons satellites were initially aimed at both America and the USSR, but now they are rotated 180 degrees and deployed to destroy the meteor. The story itself is still fascinating, but it is no longer exciting. The effects now look ridiculously bad and cheap, but back then it was the most normal thing. The execution of the story is also quite nice (quite cliché here and there) and earlier smaller meteor impacts on the earth that hit Switzerland, Hong Kong and New York heavily, were depicted quite nicely. The ending with more or less another disaster (trapped in New York by the earlier impact) in the story was quite nice and of course the meteor unites.

The cast does a creditable job (no more than that) and in particular Sean Connery (although he actually didn't do much and was mainly grumpy in the beginning) and Karl Malden. In itself it was also funny that the beautiful Sybil Danning (who can regularly be admired naked in films) also has a small role as a skier in Switzerland. All in all just a nice old-fashioned disaster movie to have seen once and certainly because of the nostalgia.

PS before the credits it is said that in 1968 a plan called "Icarus" was designed to protect the earth from possible meteors.

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original

avatar van scorsese

scorsese

  • 13155 messages
  • 11068 votes

Mediocre film in which the Americans and Russians join forces to destroy an approaching meteorite. An uninteresting disaster film with a meager story and ditto characters. The special effects are also poor and the credibility also lacks a few things. Especially from a nostalgic point of view somewhat entertaining (and partly because of the cast with quite a few sounding names).

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original

avatar van blurp194

blurp194

  • 5484 messages
  • 4187 votes

Ah yes, the 1970s with the special genre of disaster films that you had then. Fortunately that has been forgotten, perhaps due to the debacle of this monstrosity.

Because that's what it is, there shouldn't be any discussion about that. Anyone who comes up with such cringe-worthy images ten years after the moon landings, and two years after Star Wars, is still far too friendly for a professional ban. And that that was deserved, the film proves in every way - narrative, cinematography, sound - that someone did get it into his head to put an Oscar nomination on it!

Nice to see the cast, but not for the good play - they hardly show that either. Better another movie, even for an inveterate Connery of Wood fan I'd say skip this one anyway. Some lists may not be complete.

dutch flagTranslated from Dutch · View original